1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2004 Rover 75 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 75 (129 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rover 75 weights approximately 660 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Nissan Bluebird | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | Nissan | Rover |
Model | Bluebird | 75 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1189 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2750 mm |