1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2004 Volvo C70
To start off, 2004 Volvo C70 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,984 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo C70 (161 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo C70 weights approximately 500 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Volvo C70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Nissan Bluebird | 2004 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Bluebird | C70 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1189 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2670 mm |