1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2005 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2005 Seat Arosa is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,189 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Nissan Bluebird (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2005 Seat Arosa. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 2005 Seat Arosa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Seat Arosa weights approximately 55 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Seat Arosa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Nissan Bluebird | 2005 Seat Arosa | |
Make | Nissan | Seat |
Model | Bluebird | Arosa |
Year Released | 1965 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1189 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 3560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2330 mm |