1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2007 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2007 Ford Ecosport is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Nissan Bluebird | 2007 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Bluebird | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1965 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1189 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2490 mm |