1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2009 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2009 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,956 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota 4Runner (236 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 285 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Nissan Bluebird | 2009 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Bluebird | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1189 cc | 3956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 236 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2800 mm |