1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2009 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC70 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,953 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo XC70 (281 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Nissan Bluebird | 2009 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Bluebird | XC70 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1189 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2820 mm |