1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet HHR (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet HHR weights approximately 531 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Chevrolet HHR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Chevrolet HHR | |
Make | Nissan | Chevrolet |
Model | Bluebird | HHR |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1189 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1431 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4475 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1603 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2629 mm |