1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Ford F-150
To start off, 2010 Ford F-150 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-150 (292 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1452 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford F-150. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | Bluebird | F-150 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1189 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 292 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 2352 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 5885 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 2004 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1887 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3670 mm |
