1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2010 Ford Falcon is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Falcon weights approximately 774 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Bluebird | Falcon |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 261 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1704 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2838 mm |