1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Tata Nano
To start off, 2010 Tata Nano is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,189 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Nissan Bluebird (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2010 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 300 kg more than 2010 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Tata Nano. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Nissan | Tata |
| Model | Bluebird | Nano |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1189 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2230 mm |
