1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC60 (281 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 993 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Bluebird | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1189 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 281 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1893 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1712 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2774 mm |
