1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC90 (185 HP) has 132 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1255 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Bluebird | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1189 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 185 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 2155 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4808 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1897 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1783 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2860 mm |
