1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2011 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando (128 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 765 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Nissan Bluebird | 2011 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Nissan | Chevrolet |
Model | Bluebird | Orlando |
Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1189 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2760 mm |