1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2011 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2011 Kia Cadenza is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Cadenza (200 HP) has 147 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 675 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Kia Cadenza. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Nissan Bluebird | 2011 Kia Cadenza | |
| Make | Nissan | Kia |
| Model | Bluebird | Cadenza |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1189 cc | 2700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4965 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2845 mm |
