1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,349 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 2 (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 2 weights approximately 135 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Nissan Bluebird | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Nissan | Mazda |
Model | Bluebird | 2 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1189 cc | 1349 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2489 mm |