1965 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Kia RIO is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Kia RIO weights approximately 249 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Nissan Bluebird | 2013 Kia RIO | |
Make | Nissan | Kia |
Model | Bluebird | RIO |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 136 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1179 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2570 mm |