1965 Nissan Cedric vs. 1950 Saab 92
To start off, 1965 Nissan Cedric is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Nissan Cedric (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1950 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1950 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 175 kg more than 1950 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Nissan Cedric | 1950 Saab 92 | |
| Make | Nissan | Saab |
| Model | Cedric | 92 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2480 mm |
