1965 Nissan Cedric vs. 1999 Honda Integra
To start off, 1999 Honda Integra is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Honda Integra (143 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Honda Integra weights approximately 219 kg more than 1965 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Nissan Cedric | 1999 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Nissan | Honda |
| Model | Cedric | Integra |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1199 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4525 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1325 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2620 mm |
