1965 Nissan Cedric vs. 2000 Honda Integra
To start off, 2000 Honda Integra is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,493 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda Integra weights approximately 219 kg more than 1965 Nissan Cedric.
Because 1965 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Nissan Cedric | 2000 Honda Integra | |
Make | Nissan | Honda |
Model | Cedric | Integra |
Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2570 mm |