1965 Nissan Cedric vs. 2006 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2006 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Bluebird (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Cedric.
Because 1965 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Bluebird, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Bluebird (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Nissan Cedric | 2006 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Nissan | Nissan |
Model | Cedric | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |