1965 Nissan Cedric vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Cube (120 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Cedric.
Because 1965 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Cube (127 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 2009 Nissan Cube will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Nissan Cedric | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
| Make | Nissan | Nissan |
| Model | Cedric | Cube |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2640 mm |
