1965 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche (307 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Cedric.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche (335 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
| Make | Nissan | Chevrolet |
| Model | Cedric | Avalanche |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 307 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 335 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3310 mm |
