1965 NSU 1000 vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1983 Zastava 102 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU 1000 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Zastava 102 (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1965 NSU 1000. (43 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1965 NSU 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Zastava 102 weights approximately 120 kg more than 1965 NSU 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 NSU 1000. (71 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1983 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 NSU 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1965 NSU 1000 | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | NSU | Zastava |
Model | 1000 | 102 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 996 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2160 mm |