1965 NSU 1000 vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU 1000 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 314 more horse power than 1965 NSU 1000. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1965 NSU 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 459 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 NSU 1000. (71 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 NSU 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 NSU 1000 | 2008 Holden UTE | |
| Make | NSU | Holden |
| Model | 1000 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 996 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
