1965 NSU 1200 vs. 2003 Tata E
To start off, 2003 Tata E is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU 1200 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Tata E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Tata E (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1965 NSU 1200. (54 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Tata E should accelerate faster than 1965 NSU 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Tata E weights approximately 658 kg more than 1965 NSU 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Tata E (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 NSU 1200. (83 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Tata E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 NSU 1200.
Compare all specifications:
1965 NSU 1200 | 2003 Tata E | |
Make | NSU | Tata |
Model | 1200 | E |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 1177 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 54 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 716 kg | 1374 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2810 mm |