1965 NSU 1200 vs. 2004 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2004 SsangYong Musso is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU 1200 would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 SsangYong Musso (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1965 NSU 1200. (54 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 1965 NSU 1200.
Because 2004 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 NSU 1200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 SsangYong Musso (305 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 NSU 1200. (83 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 NSU 1200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 NSU 1200 | 2004 SsangYong Musso | |
| Make | NSU | SsangYong |
| Model | 1200 | Musso |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1177 cc | 2874 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 54 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 22.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 133 km/hour | 151 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2830 mm |
