1965 NSU 1200 vs. 2009 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2009 Toyota Matrix is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU 1200 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1965 NSU 1200. (54 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1965 NSU 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 614 kg more than 1965 NSU 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 NSU 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 NSU 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Matrix (174 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 NSU 1200. (83 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 NSU 1200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 NSU 1200 | 2009 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | NSU | Toyota |
| Model | 1200 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1177 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 54 HP | 132 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 716 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2610 mm |
