1965 NSU Autonova vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1980 Volvo 66 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU Autonova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU Autonova would be higher. At 1,287 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 66 (56 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1965 NSU Autonova. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 1965 NSU Autonova.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 NSU Autonova | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | NSU | Volvo |
| Model | Autonova | 66 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1085 cc | 1287 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66.6 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1550 mm |
