1965 NSU Autonova vs. 1996 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 1996 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU Autonova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU Autonova would be higher. At 1,091 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 ZAZ Wagon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 NSU Autonova (53 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1996 ZAZ Wagon. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 NSU Autonova should accelerate faster than 1996 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 ZAZ Wagon weights approximately 10 kg more than 1965 NSU Autonova.
Because 1965 NSU Autonova is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 NSU Autonova. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 NSU Autonova | 1996 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | NSU | ZAZ |
| Model | Autonova | Wagon |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1085 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66.6 mm | 67 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2330 mm |
