1965 NSU Autonova vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU Autonova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU Autonova would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1965 NSU Autonova. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1965 NSU Autonova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 615 kg more than 1965 NSU Autonova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 NSU Autonova is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 NSU Autonova. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1965 NSU Autonova has manual transmission. 1965 NSU Autonova will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1965 NSU Autonova | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | NSU | Mazda |
Model | Autonova | 6 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1085 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 64 L |