1965 NSU Wankel Spider vs. 2008 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2008 Toyota Tundra is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU Wankel Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU Wankel Spider would be higher. At 3,956 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Tundra (237 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1965 NSU Wankel Spider. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1965 NSU Wankel Spider. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 595 kg more than 1965 NSU Wankel Spider. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 NSU Wankel Spider is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 NSU Wankel Spider. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Tundra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Tundra (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 NSU Wankel Spider. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 NSU Wankel Spider.
Compare all specifications:
1965 NSU Wankel Spider | 2008 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | NSU | Toyota |
Model | Wankel Spider | Tundra |
Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 495 cc | 3956 cc |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 361 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3590 mm | 5820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 3710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 100 L |