1965 NSU Wankel Spider vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU Wankel Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU Wankel Spider would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (572 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 523 more horse power than 1965 NSU Wankel Spider. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1965 NSU Wankel Spider.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (754 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 680 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 NSU Wankel Spider. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 NSU Wankel Spider.
Compare all specifications:
1965 NSU Wankel Spider | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | NSU | Chevrolet |
Model | Wankel Spider | Camaro |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 495 cc | 6200 cc |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 572 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 754 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3590 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 72 L |