1965 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 1954 Saab 92B
To start off, 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Saab 92B would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 1035 kg more than 1954 Saab 92B.
Because 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Saab 92B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | 1954 Saab 92B | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Saab |
Model | Starfire | 92B |
Year Released | 1965 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 6965 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2480 mm |