1965 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 1966 Simca 1200S
To start off, 1966 Simca 1200S is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 965 kg more than 1966 Simca 1200S.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | 1966 Simca 1200S | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Simca |
| Model | Starfire | 1200S |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 6965 cc | 1204 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 53 L |
