1965 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 300 kg more than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Starfire | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6965 cc | 5798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 125 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2760 mm |
