1965 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 1980 Saab 900
To start off, 1980 Saab 900 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 640 kg more than 1980 Saab 900.
Because 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Saab 900, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | 1980 Saab 900 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Saab |
| Model | Starfire | 900 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6965 cc | 1985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2530 mm |
