1965 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 1996 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 1996 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | 1996 Oldsmobile SS | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Starfire | SS |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6965 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 238 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |
