1965 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 2005 Seat Toledo
To start off, 2005 Seat Toledo is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 549 kg more than 2005 Seat Toledo.
Because 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | 2005 Seat Toledo | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Seat |
| Model | Starfire | Toledo |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6965 cc | 1968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1271 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 55 L |
