1965 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 2008 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 708 kg more than 2008 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | 2008 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Volkswagen |
| Model | Starfire | Polo |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6965 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1112 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |
