1965 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 2010 Suzuki SX4
To start off, 2010 Suzuki SX4 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 485 kg more than 2010 Suzuki SX4.
Because 2010 Suzuki SX4 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki SX4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | 2010 Suzuki SX4 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Suzuki |
| Model | Starfire | SX4 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6965 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1335 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4135 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1605 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2499 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |
