1965 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 2011 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 155 kg more than 2011 Chevrolet Orlando.
Because 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | 2011 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Chevrolet |
Model | Starfire | Orlando |
Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6965 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2760 mm |