1965 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 190 kg more than 2013 Aston Martin Vantage.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | 2013 Aston Martin Vantage | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Aston Martin |
| Model | Starfire | Vantage |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6965 cc | 5935 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4382 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |
