1965 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 2013 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2013 Ford Expedition is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Expedition weights approximately 832 kg more than 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire.
Because 2013 Ford Expedition is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Expedition will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | 2013 Ford Expedition | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Ford |
| Model | Starfire | Expedition |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6965 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 306 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 2652 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5245 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1961 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 3023 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 106 L |
