1965 Peugeot 204 vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 1976 Volvo 66 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Peugeot 204. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Peugeot 204 would be higher. At 1,289 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Volvo 66 (56 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1965 Peugeot 204. (52 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 1965 Peugeot 204.
Because 1976 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Peugeot 204, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Volvo 66 (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Peugeot 204. (82 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1976 Volvo 66 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Peugeot 204.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Peugeot 204 | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Peugeot | Volvo |
Model | 204 | 66 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1130 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 82 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 64 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1550 mm |