1965 Peugeot 404 vs. 2010 Jeep Patriot
To start off, 2010 Jeep Patriot is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Peugeot 404. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Peugeot 404 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Patriot is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Patriot (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1965 Peugeot 404. (55 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 1965 Peugeot 404.
Because 1965 Peugeot 404 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Peugeot 404. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Patriot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Peugeot 404 | 2010 Jeep Patriot | |
Make | Peugeot | Jeep |
Model | 404 | Patriot |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1618 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 51 L |