1965 Plymouth Valiant vs. 1952 Saab 92
To start off, 1965 Plymouth Valiant is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Plymouth Valiant (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Plymouth Valiant should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92.
Because 1965 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Plymouth Valiant | 1952 Saab 92 | |
| Make | Plymouth | Saab |
| Model | Valiant | 92 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2789 cc | 764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2480 mm |
