1965 Plymouth Valiant vs. 1997 Acura CL
To start off, 1997 Acura CL is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura CL (145 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1965 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1965 Plymouth Valiant.
Because 1965 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Plymouth Valiant | 1997 Acura CL | |
Make | Plymouth | Acura |
Model | Valiant | CL |
Year Released | 1965 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2789 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 145 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2715 mm |