1965 Plymouth Valiant vs. 2010 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Plymouth Valiant (100 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2010 Honda Jazz. (77 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Plymouth Valiant should accelerate faster than 2010 Honda Jazz.
Because 1965 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Plymouth Valiant | 2010 Honda Jazz | |
Make | Plymouth | Honda |
Model | Valiant | Jazz |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2789 cc | 1245 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 77 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2460 mm |