1965 Pontiac Tempest vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 3,522 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Pontiac Tempest (118 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 460 kg more than 1965 Pontiac Tempest.
Because 1965 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Pontiac Tempest | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Pontiac | Renault |
Model | Tempest | Clio |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3522 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2580 mm |