1965 Renault 10 vs. 1973 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1973 Zastava 1300 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault 10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault 10 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Zastava 1300 (53 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1965 Renault 10. (42 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Zastava 1300 should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 10. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 209 kg more than 1965 Renault 10. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Zastava 1300 (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Renault 10. (77 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1973 Zastava 1300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Renault 10.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Renault 10 | 1973 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Renault | Zastava |
Model | 10 | 1300 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1973 |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 42 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 77 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 775 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2430 mm |